Evidence of Cover-up… literally
By: James Burge
July 19th, 2010
Problem solved, well almost… now look away!!
By: James Burge
July 19th, 2010
I just came across a video, and it’s not the only one, showing that although the oil leak has been capped, and slightly abated, they have only succeeded in moving the leak from the ocean floor, to a location that would lay hundreds, maybe even thousands of feet below the ground. What has happened is that by capping the oil leak, they have increased the pressure in the well, such that it now has a greater pressure with which to flow from cracks deep down the well so it is now seeping from fissures in the bottom of the ocean floor. Probably the strangest part of this story is that this is what should be expected to happen given that the line is thought to be damaged due to the explosion that started this whole mess. This is why most experts were saying that capping the well wouldn’t help and it could make it worse, forcing oil through cracks, deep in the earth, making them bigger, thereby allowing more oil to seep into the gulf, which could never be stopped using methods BP is currently employing. Which raises the question, if they know that this method won’t work, why are they trying it? Or is it just that only experts not affiliated with BP think this isn’t going to work, and BP has gotten bad advice. All we know at this point is that the idea that they couldn’t have known this would be the possible result of a cap is ludicrous possibly criminal. Pollute away BP…
The upside, flow has been reduced from a maximum some experts are estimating at around 100,000 bbl/day. The problem is that even if BP are reporting a small flow currently, an accurate estimate of the flow may never be truly determined as I don’t think the flow through the seabed can be accurately determined. For now, a video, showing the slow seepage of oil through the ocean floor.
No more Oysters, at least not for now…
By: James Burge
July 9th, 2010
Old Spill, finaly some truth…
By: James Burge
June 25th, 2010
Follow the money…
By: James Burge
June 11th, 2010
So new facts have come to light that both BP CEO and Goldma Sachs dumped BP stock in the days leading up to the ‘disaster.’ If that isn’t enough, the Cairman of Goldman Sachs was, until recently, also chairman of BP.
According to his September 2009 bio:
Peter Sutherland is chairman of BP plc (1997 – current). He is also chairman of Goldman Sachs International (1995 – current). He was appointed chairman of the London School of Economics in 2008…. Before these appointments, he was the founding director-general of the World Trade Organisation. He had previously served as director general of GATT since July 1993 [and was] chairman of the Board of Governors of the European Institute of Public Administration (Maastricht) 1991-1996.
Sounds like quite the globalist. It now seems that BP let the people at GS know about the ‘disaster’ with enough time to sell almost half of their holdings. So either this event happened DAYs before it was reported in the media, which is possible, or the decision was made to blow up the rig. This is likely because the data supporting the man-made global warming hypothesis, which is being used to impose carbon taxes everywhere, something the elite bankers have their heart set on, looks to have been falsified so as to exaggerate the predicted effects. Another clue to premeditation is the length of time this has remained the big news item, mainstream media will always find sexy stories to distract from things that aren’t profitable to big business. They want the world to both know what is going on and to be enraged by it, so enraged they are willing to pay governments to protect our environment, which is what I thought they were supposed to be doing anyway. I mean how was big oil given permission to build a rig such as this with no contingency plan to stop a leak if one occurred? It’s because they had more than enough money to pay lobbyists and to contribute handsomely to politicians re-election funds, which is not considered a bribe in the US because if it was, no one would be making any extra cash in addition to the salary paid for by the American taxpayers.
I have also come across an interesting article that does a good job of showing that its possible that CO2 levels have increased as a result of the warming, not the other way around. Looks to me like BP took one for the globalists, although in the end it will be you and me that truly pay for this disaster, some with our livelihoods, others through the soon to be created carbon tax.
Picture speaks for itself…
By: James Burge
June 11th, 2010
Halliburton in hot water yet again.. Bring on the hot Oil.
By: James Burge
May 28th, 2010
This seems pretty fishy (pun completely unintentional). So apparently, on Friday April 9th Halliburton announced that it will purchase emergency response oil control company Boots & Coots for around $232 million. According to Wiki “Boots & Coots/IWC is one of the world’s premier well control companies.” Meaning it is their job to clean up after a well rupture and were apparently involved with putting out the Kuwait oil rig fires. Then on April 20th, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill ‘occurred,’ looks like a good return on investment virtually overnight. Of course the interesting thing is that Halliburton was working on the Deepwater Horizon rig 20 hours BEFORE the explosion.
Approximately 20 hours prior to the catastrophic loss of well control, Halliburton had completed the cementing of the ninth and final production casing string in accordance with the well program.
- http://www.onenewspage.com/news/Politics/20100510/10873842/Halliburton-Deepwater-Horizon-Oil-Rig-Explosion-Testimony-At.htm
Considering all the dirty dealings we’ve seen from Halliburton, it would not surprise me if they planted an explosive, bought a company to clean up oil, and watched as the region is decimated by the seepage of heaving crude into the gulf of Mexico.
The question that remains is why? Was it for the money they could make cleaning up the spill? Was it a distraction? (I doubt it’s a distraction considering how little the mainstream media is discussing it) Could it be, that as the man-made global warming myth begins to unravel, they purposely blew up the rig so as to create a new Environmental disaster to further boost the pressure for a carbon tax, or some new tax that will be introduced to ‘pay for cleanup’.
What will future generations think?
By: James Burge
May 10th, 2010
After watching the short video below I am struck with a question. What will future generations think? About our lack of care for the environment, about our exploitation of developing nations, or about our apparent inaction when faced with evidence of Corporate Looting of both the Environment and the Economy. I have to say that ours is a generation that will be measured by our failure to properly place the environment and its effects on the livelihood of millions, ahead of the profits available to those corporations in the third world, where environmental regulations don’t exist. Why is it that American corporations working abroad aren’t subject to the same regulations as they are domestically? And Why haven’t they been taken to task regarding the blatant damage done? How can we expect our world to survive us when we continue to dump toxic chemicals into the water? How can we expect humans to survive in these toxic conditions? Have we already doomed humanity to extinction? Only time will tell.
Info the Airline industry doesn’t want you to see…
By: James Burge
April 29th, 2010
The following videos outline the failure of the Airline industry to act on evidence, including anecdotes from various flight crews, that the air we breathe during flight may be contaminated with Tricresyl Phosphate or TCP, an organophosphate found at a concentration of about 5% in engine oil used in the Airplane’s engines. TCP is also a Neurotoxin. The oil leaks on to hot, running engines during flight and is vaporized. It then enters the cabin through bleed air. Bleed air is unfiltered air that is compressed by turbine engines and is used to supply air to various parts of the Airplane. Inhalation of TCP leads to an inability to properly conduct electrical signals in the nervous system that causes Parkinson’s like symptoms as well as (usually) temporary paralysis. These effects are commonly referred to as Aerotoxic Syndrome, which is not an officially recognized syndrome.
There are many issues raised by this, not least of which being that people are suffering brain damage from unknowingly inhaling TCP during flights. And, surprise surprise, the Airline industry doesn’t want you to know about it. Although various airlines have apparently issued statements to their employees stating that they are investigating these and other claims made regarding bleed air, none will speak publically on the issue claiming proper study of TCP concentrations in cabin air have not been completed, which is true. However, as you see in the video, TCP residue has been found in alarmingly high concentrations in various planes that the reporter tested. Considering it is not supposed to be in the cabin at all, any traces of TCP are an issue.
The second major issue raised here is that 100% of cockpit air is supplied by bleed air (only 40% of cabin air), so the flight crew is usually the first to be effected by these issues. When you hear of pilots and co-pilots saying that they only just managed to get their O2 supply on before experiencing 5-10 minutes of near total paralysis, you can’t help but be fearful that these near misses will result in a catastrophe sooner or later. I’m not sure how long an Airplane can stay in the air without a functioning flight crew, or if the paralysis of a fight crew caused by TCP could ever be proven after a crash, but if this deceit continues, we may just find out.
More about false flags…
By: James Burge
April 21st, 2010
This video does a good job of outlining some of the problems with big government and why groups exist to couter it…
For more, or links to articles relating to some of the things mentioned in the above video chick here.
